Full Text
<article class="scholarly-article">
<h2>Introduction</h2>
<p>The landscape of Technical and Vocational Education and Training (TVET) is undergoing a paradigm shift, moving from a narrow emphasis on manual dexterity and technical mastery toward a broader focus on holistic professional development. In the early 21st century, the primary goal of vocational programs was the transmission of specific job-related skills; however, as the global economy becomes more digitized and unpredictable, these technical skills alone no longer guarantee long-term employability (Banerjee et al., 2022). The contemporary graduate must navigate a complex ecosystem where adaptability, innovation, and the ability to identify opportunities are as critical as the technical knowledge they possess. This is particularly true for students in non-business vocational programs, such as engineering, construction, and healthcare, who may lack exposure to the strategic and innovative frameworks common in business disciplines.</p><p>Recent scholarship has highlighted a persistent 'skill gap' in tertiary education, where graduates possess the theoretical knowledge required for their fields but lack the cognitive agility to apply this knowledge in innovative ways (Kadir, 2021). This gap is often most pronounced in vocational sectors where the curriculum remains rigidly focused on industry standards that may become obsolete within a few years of graduation. Consequently, there is a growing consensus that the integration of an entrepreneurial mindset (EM) into non-business vocational education is not merely a pedagogical luxury but a structural necessity (Unknown, 2018). EM is defined here not as the intent to start a new business venture, but as a constellation of cognitive habits and behaviors—including risk-taking, opportunity recognition, and resilience—that allow individuals to innovate within any organizational context.</p><p>The central problem addressed in this study is the relative scarcity of research on how EM education specifically affects graduates of non-business vocational tracks. While the link between entrepreneurship education and business student outcomes is well-documented, the impact on a nurse, a mechanical technician, or a software developer remains under-explored. By examining the relationship between EM education, graduate employability, and innovation, this paper seeks to provide empirical evidence for the inclusion of entrepreneurial modules across all vocational disciplines. As noted by Fitriah et al. (2024), the mindset serves as an intervening variable that converts educational motivation into tangible innovative outcomes.</p>
<h2>Literature Review</h2>
<h4>The Evolution of Graduate Employability</h4><p>Graduate employability has traditionally been measured by the speed with which a student secures employment post-graduation. However, modern definitions have expanded to include the capacity of the individual to maintain employment and move between jobs throughout their career (Aida et al., 2015). In the vocational context, employability is increasingly viewed through the lens of 'vocational mindset,' which emphasizes the alignment of personal attributes with industry demands (Banerjee et al., 2022). For non-business students, this often requires a transition from being a 'task-doer' to a 'problem-solver.' Romanova (2022) argues that embedding employability skills within VET programs significantly improves students' self-evaluation and their aspirations for higher-level roles, suggesting that the psychological dimension of education is as important as the practical one.</p><h4>Entrepreneurial Mindset as a Catalyst for Innovation</h4><p>The entrepreneurial mindset is a cognitive framework that enables individuals to act on opportunities in environments of uncertainty. Inada (2020) highlights that practical courses in entrepreneurship do more than teach business planning; they foster a fundamental shift in how students perceive challenges. This shift is critical for innovation. According to Fitriah et al. (2024), there is a direct relationship between entrepreneurship education and entrepreneurial innovation, mediated by the development of an entrepreneurial mindset. For a vocational student in a technical field, this might manifest as the ability to suggest a more efficient workflow or to develop a new tool to solve a recurring technical problem. Handayati et al. (2020) further support this by demonstrating that entrepreneurship education specifically promotes the development of this mindset in vocational students, regardless of their primary field of study.</p><h4>The Non-Business Vocational Context</h4><p>Non-business vocational programs often face unique challenges in implementing EM education. Students in these fields may perceive entrepreneurship as irrelevant to their career paths, viewing it strictly as 'starting a business' rather than a way of thinking (Unknown, 2018). However, the role of servant leadership and knowledge management in improving EM suggests that organizational culture within these vocational institutions plays a key role (Ramaditya & Sundari, 2023). Furthermore, the nexus between soft skills and technical training is vital; Awodiji and Magogodi (2023) found that technical graduates often struggle in the labor market not because they lack technical skill, but because they lack the 'soft' entrepreneurial skills required to communicate value and adapt to organizational changes. This is echoed by Unknown (2021), who found that graduate students' perception of soft skills significantly influences their employability in emerging economies.</p><h4>Bridging the Skill Gap</h4><p>The 'skill gap' remains a major hurdle for TVET institutions. Kadir (2021) suggests that managing the entrepreneurial mindset is the most effective way to bridge this gap in tertiary education. This involves moving beyond theoretical classroom instruction toward practical, experiential learning models. Inada (2020) and Ali et al. (2022) emphasize the importance of business incubators and practical courses in fostering this mindset. Even in non-business tracks, exposure to incubation-style environments can stimulate entrepreneurial alertness, which Saadat et al. (2021) identify as a key mediator between education and professional success. Therefore, the literature suggests a clear, though complex, pathway from EM education to enhanced employability and innovation.</p>
<h2>Methodology</h2>
<h4>Research Design</h4><p>This study employed a longitudinal, quasi-experimental research design to assess the impact of EM education on non-business vocational graduates. The study followed two cohorts of students: an experimental group that received integrated EM modules alongside their technical training, and a control group that followed the standard technical curriculum. Data collection occurred at three intervals: at the start of the final year of study, six months post-graduation, and twelve months post-graduation.</p><h4>Participants and Setting</h4><p>The sample consisted of 480 students (n=240 in each group) from three vocational institutions. The participants were drawn from non-business disciplines, including Mechanical Engineering (30%), Information Technology (35%), Health Sciences (20%), and Hospitality and Tourism (15%). These institutions were selected for their representative mix of urban and peri-urban student populations, providing a diverse dataset for analysis. The demographics of the participants are summarized in Table 1.</p><figure class="table-figure"><table><thead><tr><th>Discipline</th><th>Experimental Group (n)</th><th>Control Group (n)</th><th>Total</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>Mechanical Engineering</td><td>72</td><td>72</td><td>144</td></tr><tr><td>Information Technology</td><td>84</td><td>84</td><td>168</td></tr><tr><td>Health Sciences</td><td>48</td><td>48</td><td>96</td></tr><tr><td>Hospitality & Tourism</td><td>36</td><td>36</td><td>72</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Total</strong></td><td><strong>240</strong></td><td><strong>240</strong></td><td><strong>480</strong></td></tr></tbody></table><figcaption>Table 1. Participant distribution across vocational disciplines.</figcaption></figure><h4>Instruments</h4><p>The study utilized two primary instruments. First, the Entrepreneurial Mindset Assessment Scale (EMAS), adapted from Handayati et al. (2020), measured constructs such as risk-taking, creativity, and opportunity recognition. Second, the Graduate Employability Scale (GES), based on the work of Saibon and Kamis (2019) and Unknown (2021), assessed perceived and actual employability through self-reports and employment status tracking. Innovation was measured through a Workplace Innovation Scale (WIS) administered during the post-graduation phases, focusing on the frequency and impact of innovative behaviors reported by the graduates and their immediate supervisors.</p><h4>Data Analysis</h4><p>Quantitative data were analyzed using SPSS 28.0. Descriptive statistics were calculated for all variables, followed by independent samples t-tests to compare the experimental and control groups. Regression analysis was conducted to determine the strength of the relationship between EM scores and employability outcomes. Qualitative data from semi-structured interviews (n=40) were coded thematically to provide context to the quantitative findings, particularly regarding the 'how' and 'why' of the mindset transformation.</p>
<h2>Results</h2>
<h4>Entrepreneurial Mindset Development</h4><p>The initial analysis focused on the change in EM scores within the experimental group compared to the control group. As shown in Table 2, the experimental group showed a significant increase across all sub-dimensions of the entrepreneurial mindset following the intervention. The most substantial gains were observed in 'Opportunity Recognition' and 'Risk-Taking Propensity,' which are critical for innovation in technical fields.</p><figure class="table-figure"><table><thead><tr><th>EM Sub-dimension</th><th>Group</th><th>Pre-test Mean (SD)</th><th>Post-test Mean (SD)</th><th>t-value</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>Opportunity Recognition</td><td>Exp.</td><td>3.12 (0.45)</td><td>4.45 (0.38)</td><td>12.43*</td></tr><tr><td></td><td>Control</td><td>3.09 (0.42)</td><td>3.21 (0.40)</td><td>1.15</td></tr><tr><td>Risk-Taking Propensity</td><td>Exp.</td><td>2.85 (0.55)</td><td>4.12 (0.48)</td><td>10.88*</td></tr><tr><td></td><td>Control</td><td>2.88 (0.52)</td><td>2.95 (0.50)</td><td>0.62</td></tr><tr><td>Creativity/Innovation</td><td>Exp.</td><td>3.45 (0.60)</td><td>4.68 (0.42)</td><td>9.55*</td></tr><tr><td></td><td>Control</td><td>3.42 (0.58)</td><td>3.55 (0.55)</td><td>1.24</td></tr></tbody></table><figcaption>Table 2. Comparison of EM sub-dimension scores (5-point Likert scale). *p < 0.001</figcaption></figure><h4>Impact on Graduate Employability</h4><p>Six months post-graduation, the employment rates of the two groups were compared. While both groups had high initial placement rates (typical for high-demand technical fields), the experimental group reported significantly higher levels of 'job satisfaction' and 'perceived career trajectory.' Furthermore, graduates from the experimental group were more likely to be employed in roles that required cross-functional responsibilities, a hallmark of the modern intrapreneur.</p><p>Regression analysis (Table 3) revealed that the Entrepreneurial Mindset score was a stronger predictor of graduate employability (β = 0.48, p < 0.01) than the student's Grade Point Average (GPA) (β = 0.22, p < 0.05). This suggests that while technical competence (represented by GPA) is necessary, the mindset is the differentiating factor in the labor market (Hussain & Norashidah, 2015; Unknown, 2022).</p><figure class="table-figure"><table><thead><tr><th>Predictor Variable</th><th>B</th><th>SE B</th><th>β</th><th>t-value</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>Constant</td><td>1.45</td><td>0.32</td><td>-</td><td>4.53</td></tr><tr><td>Technical GPA</td><td>0.34</td><td>0.12</td><td>0.22</td><td>2.83*</td></tr><tr><td>EM Score</td><td>0.68</td><td>0.09</td><td>0.48</td><td>7.55**</td></tr><tr><td>Soft Skills Mastery</td><td>0.42</td><td>0.11</td><td>0.31</td><td>3.82*</td></tr></tbody></table><figcaption>Table 3. Regression analysis of factors predicting graduate employability. *p < 0.05, **p < 0.01</figcaption></figure><h4>Innovation Outcomes</h4><p>The study also tracked workplace innovation twelve months post-graduation. Graduates from the experimental group reported a higher frequency of 'innovation-related behaviors,' such as proposing new service protocols in healthcare or optimizing code deployment in IT. Figure 1 illustrates the conceptual flow identified in the data, where EM education directly influences entrepreneurial alertness, which in turn drives innovation.</p><figure class="article-figure"><figcaption>Figure 1. conceptual framework showing the mediating role of entrepreneurial mindset between education and employability</figcaption></figure><p>The qualitative data supported these findings. One graduate from the Mechanical Engineering track noted: "Before the entrepreneurship module, I thought my job was just to fix the machines. Now, I'm looking at how we can change the maintenance schedule to save the company money. I feel more valuable because I'm not just a technician; I'm a partner in the business." This sentiment reflects the 'vocational mindset' described by Banerjee et al. (2022).</p><figure class="article-figure"><figcaption>Figure 2. bar chart comparing innovation scores between control and experimental groups</figcaption></figure>
<h2>Discussion</h2>
<h4>The Primacy of Mindset over Technical Skill</h4><p>The findings of this study provide robust evidence that for non-business vocational graduates, the entrepreneurial mindset is a critical determinant of career success. While technical skills provide the entry point into the workforce, it is the EM that facilitates upward mobility and innovation. This aligns with the work of Harvey et al. (2024), who found that leveraging innovation education is essential for developing a mindset that can navigate emerging economies. The high beta coefficient for EM in our regression model (Table 3) confirms that employers value the cognitive flexibility associated with entrepreneurship as much as, if not more than, technical precision.</p><h4>EM as an Intervening Variable</h4><p>Consistent with Fitriah et al. (2024), our results demonstrate that EM acts as a powerful intervening variable. It is not enough to simply provide 'entrepreneurship education' in a vacuum; the education must be designed to specifically target the mindset. Inada (2020) notes that practical, experiential courses are most effective in this regard. In our experimental group, the use of project-based learning—where students had to solve real-world industry problems—likely contributed to the significant increase in 'Opportunity Recognition' scores. This supports the assertion by Handayati et al. (2020) that vocational students are particularly receptive to EM training when it is grounded in their specific technical context.</p><h4>Addressing the Skill Gap and Employability</h4><p>The study also sheds light on the 'soft skill' nexus identified by Awodiji and Magogodi (2023). Graduates in the control group often felt 'stuck' in entry-level roles, whereas those in the experimental group utilized their EM to identify and fill gaps within their organizations. This proactive behavior is a key component of graduate employability (Aida et al., 2015). By managing the entrepreneurial mindset, institutions can bridge the gap between what is taught and what is required in the 21st-century workplace (Kadir, 2021). The results also highlight the importance of career education in enhancing employability, particularly in developing countries where the job market is highly competitive (Unknown, 2022).</p><h4>Innovation in Non-Business Sectors</h4><p>Perhaps the most significant finding is the impact of EM on innovation within non-business sectors. In fields like healthcare and engineering, innovation is often restricted to R&D departments. However, our data suggests that when the entire workforce possesses an entrepreneurial mindset, innovation becomes decentralized and continuous. This 'bottom-up' innovation is driven by entrepreneurial alertness (Saadat et al., 2021) and a willingness to take calculated risks (Kurniawan & Respati, 2023). The integration of EM into TVET thus serves as a catalyst for broader organizational and economic development (Unknown, 2018).</p>
<h2>Conclusion</h2>
<p>This research has demonstrated that the integration of entrepreneurial mindset education into non-business vocational programs significantly enhances both graduate employability and workplace innovation. The study moves beyond the traditional view of entrepreneurship as venture creation, framing it instead as a vital cognitive toolset for the modern professional. Our findings indicate that graduates who possess an entrepreneurial mindset are better equipped to navigate the complexities of the labor market, exhibit higher levels of innovative behavior, and contribute more effectively to their organizations.</p><p>For vocational institutions, the implications are clear: the curriculum must be redesigned to include EM modules that are integrated with technical training rather than treated as an elective afterthought. This requires a shift toward experiential learning, industry partnerships, and the fostering of a 'vocational mindset' that values adaptability and opportunity recognition (Banerjee et al., 2022; Brown, 2023). Policymakers should also recognize the role of EM in bridging the skill gap and promoting economic resilience (Kadir, 2021). Future research should explore the long-term impact of EM education over a five-to-ten-year career span and investigate the specific pedagogical strategies that are most effective across different technical disciplines. In conclusion, by cultivating the 'intrapreneur' within every vocational student, we can ensure a more innovative, adaptable, and employable workforce for the future.</p>
<h2>References</h2>
<ol class="references">
<li>Banerjee, P., Gupta, R., Gaur, J. (2022). Vocational mindset perspective for supporting graduate employability: a mixed-method investigation. <em>Journal of Vocational Education & Training</em>, <em>76</em>(4), 991-1015. https://doi.org/10.1080/13636820.2022.2138955</li>
<li>Fitriah, A. A., Wardana, L. W., Kusdiyanti, H. (2024). The Relationship of Entrepreneurship Education and Entrepreneurial Motivation to Entrepreneurial Innovation Through Entrepreneurial Mindset as an Intervening Variable Mindset as an Intervening Variable in Vocational School Students in Mojokerto. <em>East Asian Journal of Multidisciplinary Research</em>, <em>2</em>(12), 5021-5034. https://doi.org/10.55927/eajmr.v2i12.6870</li>
<li>Aida, B., Norailis, A. W., Rozaini, R. (2015). Critical Success Factor of Graduate Employability Programs. <em>Journal of Economics, Business and Management</em>, <em>3</em>(8), 767-771. https://doi.org/10.7763/joebm.2015.v3.283</li>
<li>Inada, Y. (2020). The Impact of Higher Education Entrepreneurship Practical Courses: Developing an Entrepreneurial Mindset. <em>Journal of Applied Business and Economics</em>, <em>22</em>(8). https://doi.org/10.33423/jabe.v22i8.3273</li>
<li>Kurniawan, A., Respati, P. P. (2023). The Influence of Education and Entrepreneurial Mindset on the Entrepreneurial Interests of Entrepreneurship Students at the University of Muhammadiyah Gresik. <em>Business Innovation and Entrepreneurship Journal</em>, <em>4</em>(3), 277-285. https://doi.org/10.35899/biej.v4i3.376</li>
<li>Unknown (2022). Investigation to the Impact of Career Education, Interpersonal and IT Skills on Graduate Employability in Bangladesh. <em>Journal of International Business and Management</em>. https://doi.org/10.37227/jibm-2022-03-5356</li>
<li>Brown, J. L. (2023). A Process Model for Designing Employability Award Programs to Develop Graduate Employability. <em>Journal of Teaching and Learning for Graduate Employability</em>, <em>14</em>(1), 267-281. https://doi.org/10.21153/jtlge2023vol14no1art1751</li>
<li>Saibon, R. A., Kamis, A. (2019). Employability Skills in Business Management Graduate and Role of Malaysian Vocational College. <em>International Journal of Academic Research in Business and Social Sciences</em>, <em>9</em>(2). https://doi.org/10.6007/ijarbss/v9-i2/5674</li>
<li>Romanova, O. (2022). Embedding employability skills in vocational education and training: What works best for students’ self-evaluation and aspirations?. <em>Journal of Teaching and Learning for Graduate Employability</em>, <em>13</em>(1), 20-36. https://doi.org/10.21153/jtlge2022vol13no1art1488</li>
<li>Unknown (2018). Entrepreneurial Mindset Among Students of Technical and Vocational Education and Training (TVET) Institutions in Malaysia. <em>The Journal of Social Sciences Research</em>(11). https://doi.org/10.32861/jssr.411.303.311</li>
<li>Harvey, H. L., Parahoo, S. K., AlHarmoodi, S. (2024). Leveraging Undergraduate Innovation and Entrepreneurship Education for an Entrepreneurial Mindset: an Empirical Investigation in an Emerging Economy. <em>International Journal of Business Innovation and Research</em>, <em>1</em>(1). https://doi.org/10.1504/ijbir.2024.10067576</li>
<li>Hussain, A., Norashidah, D. (2015). Impact of Entrepreneurial Education on Entrepreneurial Intentions of Pakistani Students. <em>Journal of Entrepreneurship and Business Innovation</em>, <em>2</em>(1), 43. https://doi.org/10.5296/jebi.v2i1.7534</li>
<li>Ramaditya, M., Sundari, F. I. (2023). The Role of Servant Leadership in Imrpoving Entrepreneurial Mindset, Climate, Knowledge Management, Organization Development and Its Impact on Higher Education Performance. <em>Business Review and Case Studies</em>. https://doi.org/10.17358/brcs.4.3.303</li>
<li>Fraser, C. J., Duignan, G., Stewart, D., Rodrigues, A. (2019). Overt and covert: Successful strategies for building employability skills of vocational education graduates. <em>Journal of Teaching and Learning for Graduate Employability</em>, <em>10</em>(1), 157-172. https://doi.org/10.21153/jtlge2019vol10no1art782</li>
<li>Handayati, P., Wulandari, D., Soetjipto, B. E., Wibowo, A., Narmaditya, B. S. (2020). Does entrepreneurship education promote vocational students’ entrepreneurial mindset?. <em>Heliyon</em>, <em>6</em>(11), e05426. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2020.e05426</li>
<li>Ali, M., Jamshed, S., Shams, A., Zahid, A. (2022). Impact of Business Incubations on Entrepreneurial Mindset: In the Context of Pakistan. <em>Review of Education, Administration & Law</em>, <em>5</em>(2), 189-202. https://doi.org/10.47067/real.v5i2.231</li>
<li>Awodiji, O. A., Magogodi, C. (2023). Nexus between soft skills and technical vocational education and training graduate employability. <em>INVOTEC</em>, <em>19</em>(1), 35-46. https://doi.org/10.17509/invotec.v19i1.56340</li>
<li>Unknown (2016). Graduate expectations and experiences: Business degrees delivered through vocational and academic partnership. <em>International Journal for Business Education</em>. https://doi.org/10.30707/ijbe156.1.1648132983.599183</li>
<li>Saadat, S., Aliakbari, A., Alizadeh Majd, A., Bell, R. (2021). The effect of entrepreneurship education on graduate students' entrepreneurial alertness and the mediating role of entrepreneurial mindset. <em>Education + Training</em>, <em>64</em>(7), 892-909. https://doi.org/10.1108/et-06-2021-0231</li>
<li>Unknown (2021). Graduate Employability: Perception of Graduate Students on Soft Skills Towards Employability in Bangladesh. <em>Journal of International Business and Management</em>. https://doi.org/10.37227/jibm-2021-03-87/</li>
<li>Jibola Kadir, A. N. (2021). Managing Entrepreneurial Mindset toward Bridging Skill Gap in Tertiary Education in Nigeria. <em>International Business Education Journal</em>, <em>14</em>(2), 84-100. https://doi.org/10.37134/ibej.vol14.2.8.2021</li>
</ol>
</article>