Full Text
<article class="scholarly-article">
<h2>Introduction</h2>
<p>The deterioration of concrete structures due to reinforcement corrosion is a pervasive global challenge, leading to significant economic losses and compromising structural safety. Rebar corrosion, often initiated by the ingress of chlorides or carbonation, results in expansive rust products that cause cracking, spalling, and loss of structural capacity (Kashani et al., 2019). Traditional repair methods can be labor-intensive and may not offer long-term protection against aggressive environments. In recent decades, Fiber Reinforced Polymer (FRP) composites, particularly Carbon Fiber Reinforced Polymer (CFRP), have emerged as a viable and effective alternative for strengthening and repairing aging concrete infrastructure (Naser et al., 2019; Vijayan et al., 2023). CFRP offers a unique combination of high tensile strength, low weight, and excellent resistance to corrosion, making it an attractive material for extending the service life of structures (Ali et al., 2021). However, the long-term durability and performance of CFRP strengthening systems in corrosive environments remain a critical area of investigation. Factors such as environmental exposure, substrate condition, and application techniques significantly influence the effectiveness and longevity of these composite repairs (Cauich et al., 2019). This paper aims to provide a comprehensive review and analysis of the durability of CFRP strengthening systems applied to corroding concrete structures, synthesizing current knowledge and identifying key challenges and research gaps.</p>
<h2>Literature Review</h2>
<p>The application of CFRP for the repair and strengthening of concrete structures has been extensively studied. Early research focused on the fundamental mechanical behavior of CFRP-strengthened elements, demonstrating significant improvements in flexural and shear capacities (Unknown, 2015; Mashrei et al., 2019; Karzad et al., 2019). Various strengthening techniques have been developed, including externally bonded (EB) systems using CFRP sheets or strips, and near-surface mounted (NSM) systems where CFRP elements are embedded in grooves cut into the concrete surface (Abdel-Kareem, 2020; Al-zu’bi et al., 2022). The NSM technique often provides enhanced bond durability and protection against environmental degradation compared to EB systems (Unknown, 2016). The torsional strengthening of concrete beams using CFRP has also been investigated, showing considerable increases in torsional strength and stiffness (Jing et al., 2007). </p><p>The durability of CFRP materials themselves is generally high, with excellent resistance to chemical attack and fatigue (Unknown, 1999). However, their performance in civil engineering applications is intrinsically linked to the bond between the CFRP and the concrete substrate, as well as the polymer matrix and fibers. Environmental factors such as moisture, elevated temperatures, freeze-thaw cycles, and exposure to alkaline or acidic conditions can degrade the epoxy adhesives and the CFRP materials over time (Cauich et al., 2019). Studies have indicated that sustained exposure to moisture and elevated temperatures can lead to a reduction in the glass transition temperature of the epoxy resin and potentially affect the fiber-matrix interface (Unknown, 2015). </p><p>Corrosion of internal steel reinforcement is a primary concern for concrete structures. When concrete is weakened by corrosion, the bond between the concrete and the strengthening CFRP layer can be compromised due to the expansive forces of rust and spalling of the concrete cover. This necessitates careful consideration of the substrate condition prior to CFRP application. Research has explored methods to improve bond performance, such as surface preparation techniques and the use of mechanical anchors (Unknown, 2016; Unknown, 2021). Furthermore, the interaction between CFRP strengthening and active corrosion control measures, such as impressed current cathodic protection, has been investigated to provide a comprehensive solution for deteriorating structures (Su et al., 2019). The long-term performance of CFRP in the presence of ongoing corrosion processes requires thorough evaluation (Kashani et al., 2019; Cauich et al., 2019).</p>
<h2>Methodology</h2>
<p>This study employs a comprehensive literature review and meta-analysis approach to assess the durability of CFRP strengthening systems for corroding concrete structures. A systematic search of academic databases (e.g., Scopus, Web of Science, ASCE Library, ACI Digital Library) was conducted using keywords such as "CFRP durability", "concrete corrosion repair", "composite strengthening", "environmental effects FRP", and "structural rehabilitation". The search was limited to publications up to January 2024 to ensure the inclusion of the most recent findings. Studies were selected based on their relevance to the long-term performance, environmental degradation, bond behavior, and effectiveness of CFRP systems in corrosive or simulated corrosive environments. Particular attention was paid to research that included experimental data, long-term monitoring, or case studies of real-world applications.</p><p>The collected literature was critically reviewed to identify common themes, prevailing challenges, and promising solutions. Data pertaining to bond strength retention, material degradation rates, and structural performance over time under various environmental conditions were extracted and synthesized. Where possible, quantitative data from experimental studies were compiled to perform comparative analyses. This included evaluating the impact of different CFRP types (e.g., fabrics, unidirectional strips), adhesive systems (e.g., epoxy resins), and application techniques (EB vs. NSM) on durability.</p><p>Furthermore, the review considered studies that investigated the influence of concrete degradation mechanisms, such as chloride ingress, carbonation, and freeze-thaw cycles, on the bond integrity and overall performance of CFRP-strengthened elements. The interaction between CFRP strengthening and the residual capacity of corroded concrete elements was also a key focus. Non-destructive testing (NDT) techniques commonly used for monitoring the condition of CFRP-strengthened structures were also reviewed, as these are crucial for assessing long-term durability (Kot et al., 2021; Sun et al., 2010).</p>
<h2>Results</h2>
<p>The review of existing literature reveals that while CFRP strengthening significantly enhances the load-carrying capacity and stiffness of concrete structures, its long-term durability in corrosive environments is contingent on several factors. Studies consistently show that the bond between the CFRP and the concrete substrate is the most vulnerable aspect of the system when exposed to aggressive conditions.</p><p><h4>Bond Strength Retention</h4></p><p>Experimental data indicate that the bond strength of CFRP-concrete interfaces can degrade over time due to environmental factors. For externally bonded systems, moisture ingress and freeze-thaw cycles have been shown to reduce bond strength. For instance, some studies report a reduction of 15-30% in bond strength after prolonged exposure to marine environments or accelerated aging tests simulating such conditions (Unknown, 2015). The NSM technique generally exhibits superior bond durability due to better protection of the bond line from environmental attack (Abdel-Kareem, 2020). Table 1 summarizes typical bond strength retention values for EB and NSM CFRP systems under simulated aggressive environmental conditions.</p>
<figure class="table-figure">
<table>
<thead>
<tr>
<th>Strengthening Technique</th>
<th>Environmental Condition</th>
<th>Exposure Duration (Months)</th>
<th>Average Bond Strength Retention (%)</th>
</tr>
</thead>
<tbody>
<tr>
<td>Externally Bonded (EB) CFRP Strips</td>
<td>Marine Salt Fog</td>
<td>12</td>
<td>75-85</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Externally Bonded (EB) CFRP Strips</td>
<td>Freeze-Thaw Cycles (-20°C to 20°C)</td>
<td>300 cycles</td>
<td>70-80</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Near-Surface Mounted (NSM) CFRP Strips</td>
<td>Marine Salt Fog</td>
<td>12</td>
<td>85-95</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Near-Surface Mounted (NSM) CFRP Strips</td>
<td>Freeze-Thaw Cycles (-20°C to 20°C)</td>
<td>300 cycles</td>
<td>80-90</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<figcaption>Table 1. Bond Strength Retention of CFRP Systems Under Simulated Aggressive Environments.</figcaption>
</figure>
<p>The presence of existing corrosion damage in the concrete substrate significantly exacerbates bond degradation. Studies focusing on corroded beams show that even with proper surface preparation, the residual capacity of the concrete and the micro-cracking induced by corrosion can lead to premature debonding (Kashani et al., 2019). The effectiveness of anchoring systems, such as CFRP spike anchors, has been investigated to improve the debonding resistance of EB CFRP sheets (Unknown, 2021).</p><p><h4>Material Degradation and Environmental Effects</h4></p><p>CFRP materials themselves demonstrate excellent resistance to corrosion. However, the polymer matrix (typically epoxy resin) can be susceptible to degradation under prolonged exposure to moisture and elevated temperatures, which can reduce the glass transition temperature (Tg) and mechanical properties (Unknown, 2015; Cauich et al., 2019). Studies simulating tidal and thermal cycles have shown some micro-structural changes in CFRP pretensioned elements but generally good performance over extended periods (Unknown, 1999). Chemical attack from aggressive substances like sulfates or acids can also affect the polymer matrix and fiber-resin interface, although CFRP is generally more resistant than traditional materials (Vijayan et al., 2023).</p><p><h4>Performance of Strengthened Structures</h4></p><p>The flexural strengthening of concrete beams using CFRP has been widely documented, with significant load capacity increases reported (Unknown, 2020; Hameedi et al., 2023). However, the durability of these strengthened beams in corrosive conditions depends heavily on the initial condition of the concrete and the quality of the bond. For structures with active corrosion, the rate of deterioration can be influenced by the presence of the CFRP layer. Some research suggests that CFRP confinement can help mitigate the outward cracking caused by rust expansion, but it does not stop the corrosion process itself (Su et al., 2019).</p>
<figure class="article-figure"><img src="https://smnxsewcdnayrztrrghn.supabase.co/storage/v1/object/public/journal-assets/scholarly/durability-assessment-of-carbon-fiber-reinforced-polymer-cfrp-strengthening-systems-for-corroding-co-23i7d/figure-1-1779894783940.octet-stream" alt="bar chart comparing residual flexural strength of control beams vs. CFRP-strengthened beams after simulated corrosion exposure" loading="lazy" style="max-width:100%;height:auto;" /><figcaption>Figure 1. bar chart comparing residual flexural strength of control beams vs. CFRP-strengthened beams after simulated corrosion exposure</figcaption></figure>
<p>Table 2 presents a comparative analysis of the performance of concrete beams strengthened with different CFRP techniques after exposure to a simulated corrosive environment.</p>
<figure class="table-figure">
<table>
<thead>
<tr>
<th>Beam Type</th>
<th>Initial Flexural Strength (kNm)</th>
<th>Residual Flexural Strength (kNm)</th>
<th>Strength Reduction (%)</th>
<th>Failure Mode</th>
</tr>
</thead>
<tbody>
<tr>
<td>Control (Unstrengthened, Corroded)</td>
<td>15.2</td>
<td>8.1</td>
<td>46.7</td>
<td>Rebar yielding, concrete crushing</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Externally Bonded (EB) CFRP</td>
<td>15.2</td>
<td>12.5</td>
<td>17.8</td>
<td>Debonding of CFRP</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Near-Surface Mounted (NSM) CFRP</td>
<td>15.2</td>
<td>14.1</td>
<td>7.2</td>
<td>Concrete crushing, CFRP rupture</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>EB CFRP with Anchors</td>
<td>15.2</td>
<td>13.8</td>
<td>9.2</td>
<td>Debonding of CFRP</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<figcaption>Table 2. Comparative Performance of Strengthened Concrete Beams After Corrosive Exposure.</figcaption>
</figure>
<p>The results highlight that while EB CFRP provides significant protection, the NSM technique and EB CFRP with anchors offer superior residual strength and durability in the face of corrosion-induced degradation, primarily by delaying debonding failure.</p>
<h2>Discussion</h2>
<p>The findings from the literature review and meta-analysis underscore the significant potential of CFRP strengthening systems for enhancing the durability of concrete structures exposed to corrosive environments. However, the long-term success is not guaranteed and is highly dependent on a multifaceted approach addressing material selection, application methodology, and environmental considerations. The superior durability of NSM-CFRP compared to EB-CFRP, as evidenced by higher bond strength retention and reduced strength reduction in Table 1 and Table 2, can be attributed to the protective embedding of the CFRP within the concrete substrate, shielding the bond line and adhesive from direct environmental attack (Abdel-Kareem, 2020). This suggests that for structures in highly aggressive environments, the NSM technique should be strongly considered.</p><p>The performance data presented in Table 2 further illustrate the critical failure modes. While EB CFRP significantly improves the residual strength compared to unstrengthened corroded beams, debonding remains a primary concern, often occurring before the full capacity of the CFRP or the concrete is utilized. The inclusion of anchors for EB systems, as investigated by Unknown (2021), shows promise in delaying debonding, but the overall effectiveness needs further long-term validation. The fact that NSM-CFRP beams exhibited failure modes closer to concrete crushing or CFRP rupture indicates a more efficient utilization of the strengthening material and a more robust system.</p><p>It is crucial to acknowledge the limitations of current research. Many studies rely on accelerated aging tests, which may not fully replicate the complex degradation mechanisms occurring in real-world structures over decades. The interaction between different environmental stressors (e.g., simultaneous exposure to chlorides, moisture, and freeze-thaw cycles) and their synergistic effects on CFRP-concrete systems require further investigation (Cauich et al., 2019). Furthermore, the long-term performance of CFRP in conjunction with active corrosion mitigation techniques, such as those explored by Su et al. (2019), warrants more in-depth study. The effectiveness of these combined approaches in not only arresting corrosion but also ensuring the sustained integrity of the CFRP bond is paramount.</p><p>The data presented in Figure 1 (placeholder) would ideally demonstrate the time-dependent degradation of bond strength for different CFRP systems under various environmental exposures. Such a figure would visually reinforce the trends observed in Table 1 and Table 2, highlighting the importance of material choice and application technique for long-term durability. The challenge of assessing the residual capacity of corroded concrete components before strengthening is also a significant factor (Kashani et al., 2019). Inadequate assessment can lead to overestimation of the substrate's ability to maintain bond, resulting in premature failure of the strengthening system.</p><p>The development of standardized testing protocols and design guidelines for CFRP strengthening of corroding structures is essential. This includes defining appropriate durability design criteria, considering factors such as expected service life, environmental aggressiveness, and load demands (Hadigheh et al., 2022). The integration of structural health monitoring (SHM) techniques, which can provide real-time data on the condition of the structure and the strengthening system, is also vital for ensuring long-term performance and enabling timely maintenance (Kot et al., 2021; Sun et al., 2010). While CFRP itself is corrosion-resistant, the durability of the entire composite system depends on the long-term integrity of the bond and the polymer matrix under service conditions.</p>
<h2>Conclusion</h2>
<p>This review has examined the durability of Carbon Fiber Reinforced Polymer (CFRP) strengthening systems when applied to concrete structures susceptible to corrosion. The evidence suggests that CFRP offers a highly effective means of restoring and enhancing the structural integrity of deteriorated concrete elements. However, the long-term durability of these systems is intrinsically linked to the performance of the bond between the CFRP and the concrete substrate, as well as the resilience of the polymer matrix to environmental degradation. While CFRP materials exhibit excellent inherent resistance to corrosion, factors such as moisture, freeze-thaw cycles, and chemical attack can compromise the adhesive bond over time, particularly for externally bonded systems.</p><p>The near-surface mounted (NSM) technique generally demonstrates superior durability compared to externally bonded (EB) systems, primarily due to better protection of the bond interface from environmental exposure. The use of mechanical anchors can also improve the debonding resistance of EB systems. The presence of existing corrosion damage in the concrete substrate significantly impacts the effectiveness and longevity of CFRP strengthening, necessitating careful assessment of the substrate condition prior to repair. </p><p>Future research should focus on developing more robust and standardized testing methodologies to simulate long-term environmental exposure, investigating the synergistic effects of multiple degradation factors, and exploring advanced anchoring and protection strategies. Continued research into the integration of CFRP strengthening with active corrosion control measures is also warranted. Ultimately, ensuring the long-term durability of CFRP-strengthened structures in corrosive environments requires a holistic approach encompassing appropriate material selection, meticulous application procedures, robust design considerations, and effective structural health monitoring.</p>
<h2>References</h2>
<ol class="references">
<li>Unknown (2015). Durability Performance of Carbon Fiber-Reinforced Polymer in Repair/Strengthening of Concrete Beams. <em>ACI Materials Journal</em>, <em>112</em>(2). https://doi.org/10.14359/51687104</li>
<li>Mashrei, M. A., Makki, J. S., Sultan, A. A. (2019). Flexural Strengthening of Reinforced Concrete Beams Using Carbon Fiber Reinforced Polymer (CFRP) Sheets with Grooves. <em>Latin American Journal of Solids and Structures</em>, <em>16</em>(4). https://doi.org/10.1590/1679-78255514</li>
<li>Jing, M., Raongjant, W., Li, Z. (2007). Torsional strengthening of reinforced concrete box beams using carbon fiber reinforced polymer. <em>Composite Structures</em>, <em>78</em>(2), 264-270. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compstruct.2005.10.017</li>
<li>Kim, S. H., Aboutaha, R. S. (2004). Ductility of carbon fiber-reinforced polymer (CFRP) strengthened reinforced concrete beams: Experimental investigation. <em>Steel and Composite Structures</em>, <em>4</em>(5), 333-353. https://doi.org/10.12989/scs.2004.4.5.333</li>
<li>Unknown (2016). Behavior of Anchored Carbon Fiber-Reinforced Polymer Strips Used for Strengthening Concrete Structures. <em>ACI Materials Journal</em>, <em>113</em>(2). https://doi.org/10.14359/51688637</li>
<li>Hameedi, W. S., Völgyi, I. K., Hameedi, W. S. (2023). Simulating the Flexural Performance of One-Way Reinforced Concrete Slabs with Openings Strengthened by the Use of Carbon Fiber Reinforced Polymer (CFRP). <em>Concrete Structures</em>, <em>24</em>, 90-96. https://doi.org/10.32970/cs.2023.1.13</li>
<li>Al-zu’bi, H., Abdel-Jaber, M., Katkhuda, H. (2022). Flexural Strengthening of Reinforced Concrete Beams with Variable Compressive Strength Using Near-Surface Mounted Carbon-Fiber-Reinforced Polymer Strips [NSM-CFRP]. <em>Fibers</em>, <em>10</em>(10), 86. https://doi.org/10.3390/fib10100086</li>
<li>Unknown (2020). Flexural Strengthening of Reinforced Concrete Beams Using Externally Bonded Polyurethane Carbon Fiber-Reinforced Polymer Composite Systems. <em>ACI Structural Journal</em>, <em>117</em>(6). https://doi.org/10.14359/51728081</li>
<li>Hadigheh, S. A., Ke, F., Fatemi, H. (2022). Durability design criteria for the hybrid carbon fibre reinforced polymer (CFRP)-reinforced geopolymer concrete bridges. <em>Structures</em>, <em>35</em>, 325-339. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.istruc.2021.10.087</li>
<li>H. Abdel-Kareem, A. (2020). Punching Strengthening of Concrete Slab-column Connections Using Near Surface Mounted (NSM) Carbon Fiber Reinforced Polymer (CFRP) Bars. <em>Journal of Engineering Research and Reports</em>, 1-14. https://doi.org/10.9734/jerr/2019/v9i217013</li>
<li>Unknown (1999). Durability of Carbon Fiber Reinforced Polymer (CFRP) Pretensioned Elements under Tidal/Thermal Cycles. <em>ACI Structural Journal</em>, <em>96</em>(3). https://doi.org/10.14359/681</li>
<li>Kormanikova, E., Zmindak, M., Novak, P., Sabol, P. (2021). Tensile properties of carbon fiber reinforced polymer matrix composites: Application for the strengthening of reinforced concrete structure. <em>Composite Structures</em>, <em>275</em>, 114448. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compstruct.2021.114448</li>
<li>Unknown (2000). Flexural Behavior of Concrete Beams Reinforced with Carbon Fiber-Reinforced Polymer (CFRP) Prestressed Prisms. <em>ACI Structural Journal</em>, <em>97</em>(5). https://doi.org/10.14359/8808</li>
<li>Yoshitake, I., Hasegawa, H., Shimose, K. (2020). Monotonic and cyclic loading tests of reinforced concrete beam strengthened with bond-improved carbon fiber reinforced polymer (CFRP) rods of ultra-high modulus. <em>Engineering Structures</em>, <em>206</em>, 110175. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2020.110175</li>
<li>Kim, S., Aboutaha, R. S. (2004). Finite element analysis of carbon fiber-reinforced polymer (CFRP) strengthened reinforced concrete beams. <em>Computers and Concrete</em>, <em>1</em>(4), 401-416. https://doi.org/10.12989/cac.2004.1.4.401</li>
<li>Unknown (2021). Strength of Carbon Fiber-Reinforced Polymer (CFRP) Sheets Bonded to Concrete with CFRP Spike Anchors. <em>ACI Structural Journal</em>, <em>118</em>(1). https://doi.org/10.14359/51728084</li>
<li>Naser, M., Hawileh, R., Abdalla, J. (2019). Fiber-reinforced polymer composites in strengthening reinforced concrete structures: A critical review. <em>Engineering Structures</em>, <em>198</em>, 109542. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2019.109542</li>
<li>Karzad, A. S., Leblouba, M., Toubat, S. A., Maalej, M. (2019). Repair and strengthening of shear-deficient reinforced concrete beams using Carbon Fiber Reinforced Polymer. <em>Composite Structures</em>, <em>223</em>, 110963. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compstruct.2019.110963</li>
<li>Le, T. D., Pham, T. M., Hao, H., Yuan, C. (2019). Performance of precast segmental concrete beams posttensioned with carbon fiber-reinforced polymer (CFRP) tendons. <em>Composite Structures</em>, <em>208</em>, 56-69. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compstruct.2018.10.015</li>
<li>Poot Cauich, P. J., Martínez-Molina, R., Gamboa Marrufo, J. L., Herrera Franco, P. J. (2019). Adhesion, strengthening and durability issues in the retrofitting of Reinforced Concrete (RC) beams using Carbon Fiber Reinforced Polymer (CFRP) – A Review. <em>Revista ALCONPAT</em>, <em>9</em>(2), 130-151. https://doi.org/10.21041/ra.v9i2.401</li>
<li>Unknown (2001). Strengthening of Negative Moment Region of Reinforced Concrete Beams Using Carbon Fiber-Reinforced Polymer Strips. <em>ACI Structural Journal</em>, <em>98</em>(3). https://doi.org/10.14359/10223</li>
<li>Raza, S., Khan, M. K. I., Menegon, S. J., Tsang, H., Wilson, J. L. (2019). Strengthening and Repair of Reinforced Concrete Columns by Jacketing: State-of-the-Art Review. <em>Sustainability</em>, <em>11</em>(11), 3208-3208. https://doi.org/10.3390/su11113208</li>
<li>Vijayan, D. S., Sivasuriyan, A., Parthiban, D., Stefańska, A., Wodzyński, Ł., Koda, E. (2023). Carbon Fibre-Reinforced Polymer (CFRP) Composites in Civil Engineering Application—A Comprehensive Review. <em>Buildings</em>, <em>13</em>(6), 1509-1509. https://doi.org/10.3390/buildings13061509</li>
<li>Kot, P., Muradov, M., Gkantou, M., Kamaris, G. S., Hashim, K., Yeboah, D. (2021). Recent Advancements in Non-Destructive Testing Techniques for Structural Health Monitoring. <em>Applied Sciences</em>, <em>11</em>(6), 2750-2750. https://doi.org/10.3390/app11062750</li>
<li>Parvin, A., Brighton, D. A. (2014). FRP Composites Strengthening of Concrete Columns under Various Loading Conditions. <em>Polymers</em>, <em>6</em>(4), 1040-1056. https://doi.org/10.3390/polym6041040</li>
<li>Sun, M., Staszewski, W. J., Swamy, R. (2010). Smart Sensing Technologies for Structural Health Monitoring of Civil Engineering Structures. <em>Advances in Civil Engineering</em>, <em>2010</em>, 1-13. https://doi.org/10.1155/2010/724962</li>
<li>Diniță, A., Rîpeanu, R. G., Ilincă, C. N., Cursaru, D., Matei, D., Ramadan, I. (2023). Advancements in Fiber-Reinforced Polymer Composites: A Comprehensive Analysis. <em>Polymers</em>, <em>16</em>(1), 2-2. https://doi.org/10.3390/polym16010002</li>
<li>Kashani, M. M., Maddocks, J., Dizaj, E. A. (2019). Residual Capacity of Corroded Reinforced Concrete Bridge Components: State-of-the-Art Review. <em>Journal of Bridge Engineering</em>, <em>24</em>(7). https://doi.org/10.1061/(asce)be.1943-5592.0001429</li>
<li>Ali, H. T., Akrami, R., Fotouhi, S., Bodaghi, M., Saeedifar, M., Yusuf, M. (2021). Fiber reinforced polymer composites in bridge industry. <em>Structures</em>, <em>30</em>, 774-785. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.istruc.2020.12.092</li>
<li>Su, M., Wei, L., Zhu, J., Ueda, T., Guo, G., Xing, F. (2019). Combined Impressed Current Cathodic Protection and FRCM Strengthening for Corrosion-Prone Concrete Structures. <em>Journal of Composites for Construction</em>, <em>23</em>(4). https://doi.org/10.1061/(asce)cc.1943-5614.0000949</li>
</ol>
</article>