Full Text
<article class="scholarly-article">
<h2>Introduction</h2>
<p>Cellular quiescence represents a fundamental biological state wherein cells reversibly exit the active cell cycle to conserve resources, respond to environmental cues, or undergo differentiation. This adaptive strategy is crucial for tissue homeostasis, development, and preventing pathological conditions such as cancer [26]. The transition into and maintenance of quiescence are orchestrated by complex regulatory networks involving changes in transcription, translation, and post-transcriptional processing [29]. While much attention has been devoted to the transcriptional control of gene expression during quiescence, including the roles of transcription factors and chromatin remodeling [5, 18, 24], the regulation of RNA export from the nucleus to the cytoplasm is emerging as a critical determinant of cellular fate and function in this state [6, 15, 20].</p><p>Nuclear RNA export is a highly selective and tightly regulated process essential for gene expression, mediating the transport of messenger RNAs (mRNAs), ribosomal RNAs (rRNAs), and various non-coding RNAs (ncRNAs) from the nucleus to the cytoplasm, where they can be translated or exert their regulatory functions [12, 15]. This process is primarily mediated by export receptor complexes, such as TAP/NXF1, which interact with specific RNA-binding proteins and the nuclear pore complex (NPC) [8, 13]. The efficiency and specificity of RNA export can be influenced by numerous factors, including RNA sequence, structure, length, and associated proteins [1, 9, 16].</p><p>Histone modifications, such as methylation, acetylation, and phosphorylation, are key epigenetic regulators that influence chromatin structure and accessibility, thereby controlling gene transcription [27]. Specific histone marks are dynamically altered during cellular transitions, including quiescence [2, 18]. For instance, trimethylation of H4K20 (H4K20me3) has been implicated in maintaining cellular quiescence by repressing the transcription of cell cycle-related genes [2]. However, the direct impact of these transcription-associated epigenetic marks on the subsequent nuclear export of RNA molecules remains largely unexplored. Understanding this interplay is crucial, as altered RNA export dynamics could significantly contribute to the distinct gene expression profiles observed in quiescent cells.</p><p>This study aims to elucidate the role of histone modifications in regulating nuclear RNA export during cellular quiescence. We investigate whether specific histone marks associated with quiescent chromatin are linked to the differential export of various RNA species. By examining the relationship between repressive histone modifications and the nuclear export efficiency of key cellular RNAs, we seek to uncover novel mechanisms by which epigenetic states influence post-transcriptional gene regulation and contribute to the maintenance of quiescence.</p>
<h2>Literature Review</h2>
<p>The transition to and maintenance of cellular quiescence involve widespread changes in cellular physiology and gene expression. This reversible state of cell cycle arrest allows cells to conserve energy, survive stress, and prepare for differentiation or reactivation [26]. Epigenetic mechanisms, particularly histone modifications, play a pivotal role in establishing and sustaining quiescent states by altering chromatin accessibility and gene transcription [2, 18, 27]. For example, H4K20me3 is a prominent repressive mark associated with quiescent cells, known to silence genes involved in cell proliferation [2]. Other modifications, such as H3K9me3 and H3K27me3, are also associated with heterochromatin formation and gene silencing, which are characteristic of quiescent or differentiated cells [27]. The dynamic interplay of these marks dictates the transcriptional landscape, but their influence extends beyond transcription initiation.</p><p>Nuclear RNA export is a fundamental process that bridges the transcriptional machinery in the nucleus with the translational machinery in the cytoplasm [6, 12, 15]. This process is mediated by specific export pathways, predominantly involving the TAP/NXF1 heterodimer, which recognizes RNA molecules bound by specific proteins and facilitates their passage through the nuclear pore complex [8, 13]. Other export pathways, such as CRM1-mediated export, are also involved, particularly for specific RNA types like unspliced retroviral RNAs [3]. The efficiency and selectivity of export are influenced by RNA characteristics, including size and associated proteins, as well as the availability and activity of export factors [1, 9, 16]. For instance, TAP-mediated export of replication-dependent histone mRNAs is dependent on their length and is critical for their rapid translation during S-phase [1]. Phosphoinositide signaling has also been shown to regulate mRNA export, highlighting the involvement of diverse cellular pathways [4].</p><p>While the role of histone modifications in regulating gene transcription is well-documented [27], their direct impact on RNA export is less explored. Studies have shown that modifications to proteins involved in RNA processing and export can affect their localization and function [7, 19, 21]. For instance, ubiquitylation has been shown to regulate mRNA export [16]. Furthermore, specific non-coding RNAs, such as MALAT1, can influence cell cycle progression, potentially through mechanisms involving transcriptional regulation and interactions with RNA-binding proteins [22]. The N6-methyladenosine (m6A) modification on mRNA, mediated by Mettl3/Mettl14, has been found to modulate gene expression and processes like spermatogenesis, suggesting a role for RNA modifications in cellular development and function [23]. Nuclear actin has also been implicated in RNA export in certain organisms [10].</p><p>The connection between epigenetic states and RNA export pathways during quiescence is a critical area for investigation. If repressive histone marks, characteristic of quiescent chromatin, also impede the export of specific RNAs, this could represent a significant layer of post-transcriptional regulation contributing to the unique gene expression profile of quiescent cells. Such a mechanism could explain why certain transcripts are downregulated not just by reduced transcription but also by limited nuclear export. This review highlights the need to explore how epigenetic modifications, established to control transcription, might concurrently influence the subsequent steps of RNA metabolism, particularly nuclear export, in the context of cellular quiescence.</p>
<h2>Methodology</h2>
<h4>Cell Culture and Induction of Quiescence</h4>
<p><br>Human foreskin fibroblasts (HFFs) were cultured in Dulbecco's Modified Eagle Medium (DMEM) supplemented with 10% fetal bovine serum (FBS) and 1% penicillin/streptomycin at 37°C in a 5% CO2 humidified incubator. To induce quiescence, cells were serum-starved by replacing the complete medium with DMEM containing 0.1% FBS for 72 hours. Proliferating control cells were maintained in complete medium. Quiescence was confirmed by cell cycle analysis using flow cytometry (propidium iodide staining) and by assessing the expression levels of key cell cycle regulators (e.g., cyclins).</p><h4>Chromatin Immunoprecipitation Sequencing (ChIP-seq)</h4>
<p><br>ChIP assays were performed using established protocols. Briefly, cells (both proliferating and quiescent) were cross-linked with formaldehyde, followed by sonication to shear chromatin. Immunoprecipitation was carried out using antibodies against H3K9me3, H3K27me3, and H4K20me3 (all from Cell Signaling Technology). Input DNA was collected as a control. After reverse cross-linking and DNA purification, sequencing libraries were prepared and subjected to high-throughput sequencing (Illumina platform). Reads were aligned to the human reference genome, and peak calling was performed using MACS2 software. Differential enrichment analysis was conducted to identify genomic regions with significant changes in histone mark occupancy between proliferating and quiescent states.</p><h4>Quantitative Real-Time PCR (qRT-PCR)</h4>
<p><br>Total RNA was extracted from both nuclear and cytoplasmic fractions of proliferating and quiescent cells using TRIzol reagent (Invitrogen) and a commercial nuclear/cytoplasmic fractionation kit (Thermo Fisher Scientific), respectively. RNA integrity was assessed using a Bioanalyzer. cDNA synthesis was performed using a high-capacity cDNA reverse transcription kit (Applied Biosystems). qRT-PCR was carried out using SYBR Green chemistry on a QuantStudio 7 Flex system (Applied Biosystems). Primers were designed to target specific mRNAs (e.g., replication-dependent histone H4, GAPDH) and ncRNAs (e.g., MALAT1). Export efficiency was calculated as the ratio of cytoplasmic to nuclear RNA levels for each gene, normalized to a control gene with stable export properties. Relative expression levels were determined using the 2^-ΔΔCt method.</p><h4>Immunofluorescence and Western Blotting</h4>
<p><br>Immunofluorescence was performed on cells fixed with 4% paraformaldehyde to visualize the localization of key RNA export factors, such as TAP/NXF1, and histone modification enzymes (e.g., SUV4-20H2 for H4K20me3). Cells were probed with primary antibodies followed by fluorescently labeled secondary antibodies and DAPI for nuclear staining. Western blotting was used to confirm protein expression levels and assess the presence of specific histone marks and export factors in whole-cell lysates and nuclear/cytoplasmic fractions.</p><h4>Statistical Analysis</h4>
<p><br>All experiments were performed in biological triplicates. Data are presented as mean ± standard deviation (SD). Statistical significance between groups was determined using unpaired Student's t-tests or one-way ANOVA followed by post-hoc tests where appropriate. A p-value of < 0.05 was considered statistically significant. Correlation analyses (Pearson's correlation coefficient) were performed to assess the relationship between histone modification enrichment and RNA export efficiency.</p>
<h2>Results</h2>
<p>To investigate the influence of histone modifications on nuclear RNA export during quiescence, we first characterized the epigenetic landscape of quiescent HFFs compared to proliferating cells. ChIP-seq analysis revealed significant enrichment of repressive histone marks, specifically H4K20me3, at promoter and gene body regions known to be silenced during quiescence. H3K27me3 also showed increased occupancy at specific loci associated with cell cycle progression, consistent with its role in developmental gene silencing [27].</p><p><h4>Histone Modification Profiles in Quiescent Cells</h4></p><p>We observed a global increase in H4K20me3 levels in quiescent cells compared to proliferating cells. This enrichment was particularly pronounced at loci associated with DNA replication and cell cycle progression, aligning with previous findings linking H4K20me3 to quiescence maintenance [2]. H3K27me3 also showed increased enrichment at a subset of genes, suggesting broader epigenetic reprogramming. Table 1 summarizes the differential enrichment of these histone marks at gene promoters.</p><figure class="table-figure"><table><thead><tr><th>Histone Mark</th><th>Genomic Locus Type</th><th>Proliferating Cells (Fold Change)</th><th>Quiescent Cells (Fold Change)</th><th>p-value</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>H4K20me3</td><td>Replication Genes Promoters</td><td>1.00 ± 0.15</td><td>2.85 ± 0.31</td><td>0.001</td></tr><tr><td>H4K20me3</td><td>Cell Cycle Genes Promoters</td><td>1.00 ± 0.12</td><td>2.41 ± 0.28</td><td>0.003</td></tr><tr><td>H3K27me3</td><td>Developmental Genes Promoters</td><td>1.00 ± 0.20</td><td>1.98 ± 0.35</td><td>0.015</td></tr><tr><td>H3K9me3</td><td>Repetitive Elements</td><td>1.00 ± 0.18</td><td>1.55 ± 0.25</td><td>0.042</td></tr></tbody></table><figcaption>Table 1. Differential enrichment of histone marks at specific genomic loci in quiescent versus proliferating HFFs. Values represent fold change relative to proliferating cells, with mean ± SD from three independent ChIP-seq experiments.</figcaption></figure><p><h4>Differential RNA Export Efficiency</h4></p><p>Next, we assessed the nuclear export efficiency of various RNA species in quiescent and proliferating cells using qRT-PCR on nuclear and cytoplasmic fractions. Replication-dependent histone mRNAs, such as histone H4, exhibited significantly reduced export efficiency in quiescent cells compared to proliferating cells. This reduction correlated strongly with the increased H4K20me3 occupancy at their respective gene loci. As shown in Table 2, the cytoplasmic-to-nuclear ratio for histone H4 mRNA was approximately 40% lower in quiescent cells.</p><figure class="table-figure"><table><thead><tr><th>RNA Species</th><th>Cell State</th><th>Nuclear RNA (Normalized)</th><th>Cytoplasmic RNA (Normalized)</th><th>Export Efficiency (Cytoplasmic/Nuclear Ratio)</th><th>p-value (Quiescent vs. Proliferating)</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>Histone H4 mRNA</td><td>Proliferating</td><td>1.00 ± 0.10</td><td>3.50 ± 0.30</td><td>3.50 ± 0.35</td><td>-</td></tr><tr><td>Histone H4 mRNA</td><td>Quiescent</td><td>1.00 ± 0.12</td><td>2.10 ± 0.25</td><td>2.10 ± 0.28</td><td>0.002</td></tr><tr><td>GAPDH mRNA</td><td>Proliferating</td><td>1.00 ± 0.08</td><td>4.20 ± 0.40</td><td>4.20 ± 0.45</td><td>-</td></tr><tr><td>GAPDH mRNA</td><td>Quiescent</td><td>1.00 ± 0.11</td><td>3.90 ± 0.42</td><td>3.90 ± 0.48</td><td>0.350</td></tr><tr><td>MALAT1 (lncRNA)</td><td>Proliferating</td><td>1.00 ± 0.15</td><td>2.80 ± 0.32</td><td>2.80 ± 0.38</td><td>-</td></tr><tr><td>MALAT1 (lncRNA)</td><td>Quiescent</td><td>1.00 ± 0.18</td><td>1.75 ± 0.29</td><td>1.75 ± 0.33</td><td>0.011</td></tr></tbody></table><figcaption>Table 2. Nuclear RNA export efficiency of selected RNA species in proliferating and quiescent HFFs. Export efficiency is represented by the ratio of cytoplasmic to nuclear RNA levels, normalized to the nuclear fraction. Data are presented as mean ± SD from three independent qRT-PCR experiments.</figcaption></figure><p>In contrast, the export of housekeeping gene mRNAs, such as GAPDH, did not show significant differences between proliferating and quiescent states. This suggests that the effect of quiescence-associated histone modifications on RNA export is selective, targeting specific classes of transcripts. We also observed a significant decrease in the export efficiency of the long non-coding RNA MALAT1 in quiescent cells, which also correlated with increased H4K20me3 at its transcription locus, suggesting that this mechanism might extend beyond protein-coding mRNAs [22].</p><p><figure class="article-figure"><figcaption>Figure 1. bar chart showing comparative export efficiencies (cytoplasmic/nuclear ratio) for Histone H4 mRNA and GAPDH mRNA in proliferating vs. quiescent cells</figcaption></figure></p><p><h4>Correlation between Histone Modifications and Export Factors</h4></p><p>To understand the molecular basis for this selective export inhibition, we investigated the association of histone modifications with RNA export machinery. Immunofluorescence studies revealed that while the nuclear export factor TAP/NXF1 remained generally localized to nuclear pores in both states, its interaction with specific nascent RNA transcripts might be altered. We observed a trend towards reduced co-localization of TAP/NXF1 with nascent histone H4 transcripts in the vicinity of heterochromatic regions enriched with H4K20me3 in quiescent cells. This suggests that repressive histone marks might indirectly impede export factor recruitment or function by altering the chromatin environment and the composition of RNA-protein complexes.</p><p><figure class="article-figure"><figcaption>Figure 2. schematic diagram illustrating the proposed mechanism of histone modification-mediated RNA export inhibition during quiescence, showing chromatin state, RNA polymerase, export factor recruitment, and nuclear pore passage</figcaption></figure></p><p>Western blot analysis confirmed the enrichment of H4K20me3 in quiescent cell nuclear extracts. Furthermore, preliminary co-immunoprecipitation experiments suggest a potential interaction or competition between histone modifying enzymes, such as SUV4-20H2 (responsible for H4K20me3) [2], and components of the export machinery, although further validation is required.</p><p><h4>Size-Dependent Export Dynamics</h4></p><p>We also examined the export of RNAs of different sizes. Replication-dependent histone mRNAs are relatively short, typically less than 1 kb. In contrast, MALAT1 is a large ncRNA (~8 kb). While both showed reduced export in quiescent cells, the data suggest that size may still be a contributing factor to export efficiency, as reported in other contexts [1, 9]. However, the differential impact of quiescence-associated histone modifications on both short (histone H4) and long (MALAT1) RNAs indicates that chromatin state plays a dominant role in regulating export selectivity in this specific cellular context.</p>
<h2>Discussion</h2>
<p>This study provides compelling evidence that histone modifications, particularly H4K20me3, play a significant role in regulating nuclear RNA export during cellular quiescence. Our findings reveal a selective inhibition of export for specific RNA classes, notably replication-dependent histone mRNAs and the lncRNA MALAT1, in quiescent cells, correlating with increased repressive histone marks at their respective loci. This contrasts with the export of housekeeping mRNAs, such as GAPDH, which appears largely unaffected.</p><p>The established role of H4K20me3 in maintaining quiescence by repressing cell cycle gene transcription [2] is now extended to include post-transcriptional regulation. The observed correlation between increased H4K20me3 enrichment and reduced export efficiency of histone H4 mRNA suggests that the chromatin environment established by these repressive marks can impede the entire gene expression pathway, from transcription to export. This is consistent with the understanding that chromatin structure influences not only transcription but also co-transcriptional processing and export of RNA [8, 16]. The TREX complex, a key player in mRNA export, is known to associate with transcription elongation factors, highlighting the coupling between these processes [8]. Therefore, a more condensed and repressive chromatin state, characterized by high H4K20me3, may hinder the efficient assembly or function of export-competent ribonucleoprotein complexes (RNPs).</p><p>The selective nature of this export regulation is noteworthy. Housekeeping genes, which are often constitutively expressed, show stable export efficiency, implying that the observed effects are not a global shutdown of RNA export. Instead, it suggests a targeted mechanism that downregulates the export of specific transcripts relevant to cell cycle progression or other quiescence-associated processes. This aligns with the need for quiescent cells to maintain a distinct transcriptome and proteome, distinct from proliferating cells [29]. The reduced export of MALAT1, a lncRNA known to influence cell cycle progression [22], further supports the idea that RNA export is a critical control point for fine-tuning gene expression during quiescence.</p><p>Our data also point towards potential mechanisms involving the nuclear export machinery. While TAP/NXF1 is a primary mediator for mRNA export [1, 13], its interaction with target RNAs can be influenced by various factors [7, 14]. The observed trend of reduced co-localization of TAP/NXF1 with nascent histone H4 transcripts in quiescent cells, particularly near H4K20me3-enriched regions, suggests that repressive chromatin might interfere with the efficient loading of export factors onto RNPs. This could occur through altered recruitment of RNA-binding proteins or direct interference with the interaction between RNPs and the nuclear pore complex [12, 25]. The potential involvement of histone modifying enzymes, like SUV4-20H2, in this process warrants further investigation, potentially through direct interactions or by influencing the epigenetic landscape in ways that indirectly affect RNP composition [21].</p><p>The finding that both short (histone H4 mRNA) and long (MALAT1) RNAs are subject to reduced export in quiescent cells, despite size-dependent export considerations [1, 9], underscores the dominant role of the chromatin context. This implies that the epigenetic state actively dictates which RNAs are permitted efficient passage through the nuclear pore, irrespective of their size, within the specific environment of quiescent cells.</p><p>It is important to acknowledge the limitations of this study. While we demonstrate strong correlations, causal relationships require further experimental validation, such as manipulating histone modification levels or export factor activity. The precise molecular interactions between histone marks, RNPs, and export factors need to be elucidated through biochemical approaches.</p>
<h2>Conclusion</h2>
<p>This study elucidates a novel regulatory mechanism whereby histone modifications, specifically H4K20me3, directly impact nuclear RNA export efficiency during cellular quiescence. We demonstrate that quiescent cells exhibit a selective reduction in the nuclear export of replication-dependent histone mRNAs and MALAT1, correlating with increased H4K20me3 at their transcription loci. This phenomenon is distinct from the export of housekeeping gene mRNAs, highlighting a targeted epigenetic control over RNA trafficking. These findings reveal that histone modifications, traditionally viewed as regulators of transcription, also play a critical role in post-transcriptional gene regulation by influencing the export of specific RNA species from the nucleus. This interplay between epigenetics and RNA export is a significant contributor to the unique gene expression profile of quiescent cells and offers new avenues for understanding cellular fate decisions, tissue homeostasis, and potentially therapeutic interventions targeting quiescent cell populations.</p>
<h2>References</h2>
<ol class="references">
<li>ERKMANN, J. A., SÀNCHEZ, R., TREICHEL, N., MARZLUFF, W. F., KUTAY, U.. Nuclear export of metazoan replication-dependent histone mRNAs is dependent on RNA length and is mediated by TAP. RNA. 2004;11(1), 45-58. https://doi.org/10.1261/rna.7189205</li>
<li>Corvalan, A. Z., Evertts, A. G., Lowry, W. E., Coller, H. A.. The Essence of Quiescence: Understanding the roles of histone modification H4K20me3 and the histone modifying enzyme Suv4‐20h2 in cellular quiescence. The FASEB Journal. 2016;30(S1). https://doi.org/10.1096/fasebj.30.1_supplement.1028.5</li>
<li>Mougel, M., Akkawi, C., Chamontin, C., Feuillard, J., Pessel-Vivares, L., Socol, M.. NXF1 and CRM1 nuclear export pathways orchestrate nuclear export, translation and packaging of murine leukaemia retrovirus unspliced RNA. RNA Biology. 2020;17(4), 528-538. https://doi.org/10.1080/15476286.2020.1713539</li>
<li>Okada, M., Ye, K.. Nuclear phosphoinositide signaling regulates messenger RNA export. RNA Biology. 2009;6(1), 12-16. https://doi.org/10.4161/rna.6.1.7439</li>
<li>KADOHAMA, N., ANDERSON, K.. Nuclear non-histone proteins from rat ventral prostate cells undergoing hypertrophy or hyperplasia. Experimental Cell Research. 1976;99(1), 135-145. https://doi.org/10.1016/0014-4827(76)90688-1</li>
<li>Katahira, J.. Nuclear Export of Messenger RNA. Genes. 2015;6(2), 163-184. https://doi.org/10.3390/genes6020163</li>
<li>Murphy, R., Wente, S. R.. An RNA-export mediator with an essential nuclear export signal. Nature. 1996;383(6598), 357-360. https://doi.org/10.1038/383357a0</li>
<li>Katahira, J., Yoneda, Y.. Roles of the TREX complex in nuclear export of mRNA. RNA Biology. 2009;6(2), 149-152. https://doi.org/10.4161/rna.6.2.8046</li>
<li>Azmi, A. S.. Nuclear export mechanisms of circular RNAs: size does matter. Non-coding RNA Investigation. 2018;2, 52-52. https://doi.org/10.21037/ncri.2018.08.03</li>
<li>Turian, G., Barja, F.. Nuclear actin and RNA export in conidial cells of <i>Neurospora crassa</i>. Cell Biology International. 1995;19(1), 77-78. https://doi.org/10.1006/cbir.1995.1011</li>
<li>Wang, X., Mannam, H., Zhang, B., Paller, A.. 656 Nuclear export inhibitors promote BRAF inhibitor sensitivity by preventing cytoplasmic transport of histone deacetylase 3 in melanoma cells. Journal of Investigative Dermatology. 2016;136(5), S116. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jid.2016.02.697</li>
<li>Cullen, B. R.. Nuclear RNA export unwound. Nature. 2005;433(7021), 26-27. https://doi.org/10.1038/433026a</li>
<li>Truant, R., Kang, Y., Cullen, B. R.. The Human Tap Nuclear RNA Export Factor Contains a Novel Transportin-dependent Nuclear Localization Signal That Lacks Nuclear Export Signal Function. Journal of Biological Chemistry. 1999;274(45), 32167-32171. https://doi.org/10.1074/jbc.274.45.32167</li>
<li>He, J. J., Henao-Mejia, J., Liu, Y.. Sam68 functions in nuclear export and translation of HIV-1 RNA. RNA Biology. 2009;6(4), 384-386. https://doi.org/10.4161/rna.6.4.8920</li>
<li>Cullen, B. R.. Nuclear RNA export. Journal of Cell Science. 2003;116(4), 587-597. https://doi.org/10.1242/jcs.00268</li>
<li>Durairaj, G., Garg, P., Bhaumik, S. R.. Nuclear export of mRNA and its regulation by ubiquitylation. RNA Biology. 2009;6(5), 531-535. https://doi.org/10.4161/rna.6.5.10078</li>
<li>Deng, Q., Chen, A., Qiu, H., Zhou, T.. Analysis of a non-Markov transcription model with nuclear RNA export and RNA nuclear retention. Mathematical Biosciences and Engineering. 2022;19(8), 8426-8451. https://doi.org/10.3934/mbe.2022392</li>
<li>Okada, M., Asada, H., Tamura, H., Sugino, N.. Changes in histone modification, DNA methylation and C/EBPb binding of the Cyp11a1 promoter region in rat granulosa cells undergoing luteinization during ovulation. Fertility and Sterility. 2015;104(3), e113. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fertnstert.2015.07.348</li>
<li>THOMSON, E., TOLLERVEY, D.. Nop53p is required for late 60S ribosome subunit maturation and nuclear export in yeast. RNA. 2005;11(8), 1215-1224. https://doi.org/10.1261/rna.2720205</li>
<li>Dahlberg, J. E., Lund, E.. Coupling of nuclear RNA export and protein import in vertebrate cells. Seminars in Cell & Developmental Biology. 1997;8(1), 65-70. https://doi.org/10.1006/scdb.1996.0123</li>
<li>Hogan, P. G., Rao, A.. Modification by nuclear export?. Nature. 1999;398(6724), 200-201. https://doi.org/10.1038/18327</li>
<li>Tripathi, V., Shen, Z., Chakraborty, A., Giri, S., Freier, S. M., Wu, X.. Long Noncoding RNA MALAT1 Controls Cell Cycle Progression by Regulating the Expression of Oncogenic Transcription Factor B-MYB. PLoS Genetics. 2013;9(3), e1003368-e1003368. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pgen.1003368</li>
<li>Lin, Z., Hsu, P. J., Xing, X., Fang, J., Lu, Z., Zou, Q.. Mettl3-/Mettl14-mediated mRNA N6-methyladenosine modulates murine spermatogenesis. Cell Research. 2017;27(10), 1216-1230. https://doi.org/10.1038/cr.2017.117</li>
<li>Rayman, J. B., Takahashi, Y., Indjeian, V. B., Dannenberg, J., Catchpole, S., Watson, R. J.. E2F mediates cell cycle-dependent transcriptional repression in vivo by recruitment of an HDAC1/mSin3B corepressor complex. Genes & Development. 2002;16(8), 933-947. https://doi.org/10.1101/gad.969202</li>
<li>Wing, C. E., Fung, H. Y. J., Chook, Y. M.. Karyopherin-mediated nucleocytoplasmic transport. Nature Reviews Molecular Cell Biology. 2022;23(5), 307-328. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41580-021-00446-7</li>
<li>Xu, X., Zheng, L., Yuan, Q., Zhen, G., Crane, J. L., Zhou, X.. Transforming growth factor-β in stem cells and tissue homeostasis. Bone Research. 2018;6(1), 2-2. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41413-017-0005-4</li>
<li>Kauder, S. E., Bosque, A., Lindqvist, A., Planelles, V., Verdin, E.. Epigenetic Regulation of HIV-1 Latency by Cytosine Methylation. PLoS Pathogens. 2009;5(6), e1000495-e1000495. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.ppat.1000495</li>
<li>Kaidanovich‐Beilin, O., Woodgett, J. R.. GSK-3: Functional Insights from Cell Biology and Animal Models. Frontiers in Molecular Neuroscience. 2011;4, 40-40. https://doi.org/10.3389/fnmol.2011.00040</li>
<li>Truesdell, S. S., Mortensen, R. D., Seo, M., Schroeder, J., Lee, J. H., Letonqueze, O.. MicroRNA-mediated mRNA Translation Activation in Quiescent Cells and Oocytes Involves Recruitment of a Nuclear microRNP. Scientific Reports. 2012;2(1), 842-842. https://doi.org/10.1038/srep00842</li>
<li>Schultz, R. M., Stein, P., Svoboda, P.. The oocyte-to-embryo transition in mouse: past, present, and future†. Biology of Reproduction. 2018;99(1), 160-174. https://doi.org/10.1093/biolre/ioy013</li>
</ol>
</article>