Full Text
<article class="scholarly-article">
<h2>Introduction</h2>
<p>Myocardial infarction remains a leading cause of morbidity and mortality globally, primarily due to the heart's inability to regenerate lost cardiomyocytes and the subsequent formation of non-contractile fibrotic tissue. While traditional regenerative medicine has focused on cell transplantation and structural support, the critical role of the innate immune response in determining the outcome of cardiac repair has only recently been fully appreciated [1, 5]. In the wake of cardiac injury, the local environment is flooded with immune cells, with macrophages acting as central regulators of both inflammation and subsequent repair [5, 13].</p><p>Macrophages exhibit a spectrum of phenotypes, traditionally simplified into the pro-inflammatory M1 and the anti-inflammatory, pro-reparative M2 states. In the early stages of MI, M1 macrophages dominate, facilitating the clearance of necrotic debris; however, a failure to transition to an M2-dominant environment leads to chronic inflammation and adverse ventricular remodeling [8, 19]. Current research suggests that the physical and chemical properties of the biomaterials used in cardiac patches or injectables can be tailored to direct this phenotypic switch [2, 6]. Factors such as surface topography, mechanical strain, and the release of bioactive molecules are instrumental in guiding macrophage behavior [3, 4, 18].</p><p>The development of immunomodulatory biomaterials seeks to provide 'instructive' cues that mimic the fetal regenerative environment, where M2-like macrophages are predominant and scarless healing is observed [13, 21]. This paper explores the integration of silk-based biomaterials [9, 12], RGD peptide functionalization [20], and mesenchymal stem cell-derived extracellular vesicles (MSC-EVs) [23, 24] to create a microenvironment conducive to cardiac regeneration. By focusing on the PPAR/JAK-STAT signaling pathways and the regulation of metabolic shifts within macrophages [10], we aim to demonstrate a robust methodology for enhancing functional recovery post-MI.</p>
<h2>Literature Review</h2>
<h4>The Role of Macrophage Polarization in Tissue Repair</h4><p>Macrophage polarization is not a binary state but a dynamic continuum influenced by local environmental cues. The M1 phenotype, characterized by the expression of CD80 and CD86, is triggered by Toll-like receptor (TLR) ligands and interferon-gamma (IFN-γ), leading to the production of pro-inflammatory cytokines such as TNF-α and IL-1β [5, 17]. Conversely, M2 macrophages, marked by CD206 and Arginase-1, are induced by IL-4 or IL-13 and promote tissue remodeling and angiogenesis [11, 26]. In bone and skin regeneration, the timely transition from M1 to M2 is essential for successful healing [1, 11, 19]. In the heart, this transition is particularly delicate; excessive pro-inflammatory signaling results in wall thinning and rupture, while premature M2 activation may lead to excessive fibrosis [8, 13].</p><h4>Biophysical Cues and Immunomodulation</h4><p>The physical properties of a scaffold—such as fiber diameter, pore size, and elasticity—directly influence macrophage morphology and gene expression. Garg et al. demonstrated that electrospun scaffolds with larger fiber diameters tend to promote an M2 phenotype, whereas smaller diameters encourage M1 polarization [18]. Furthermore, mechanical strain within the cardiac environment can modulate cytokine secretion. Ballotta et al. found that cyclic strain significantly influences the inflammatory profile of macrophages within scaffolds [4]. Topographical guidance, including micro- and nano-patterns, provides additional cues that direct the cytoarchitectural polarization of cells, as observed in primary neurons and increasingly applied to immune cells [3].</p><h4>Biochemical and Metabolic Regulation</h4><p>Recent studies highlight the metabolic reprogramming that accompanies macrophage polarization. M1 macrophages typically rely on glycolysis, while M2 macrophages utilize fatty acid oxidation and oxidative phosphorylation [8]. Biomaterials that can modulate these pathways, such as those targeting the PPAR/JAK-STAT signaling axis, offer a potent means of directing cell fate [10]. Additionally, the incorporation of specific motifs like RGD (Arg-Gly-Asp) peptides enhances cell attachment and survival through integrin-specific signaling [20, 30]. The use of bioactive glass and decellularized extracellular matrix (dECM) hydrogels has also shown promise in creating a biomimetic niche that supports endogenous repair mechanisms [16, 29].</p><h4>Extracellular Vesicles in Immunomodulation</h4><p>Mesenchymal stem cell-derived extracellular vesicles (MSC-EVs) or exosomes have emerged as a powerful cell-free alternative for immunomodulation [23, 24]. These vesicles carry a cargo of miRNAs, proteins, and lipids that can reprogram macrophages toward an M2 phenotype and enhance angiogenesis [16, 27]. For instance, miR-451a and miR-21 have been implicated in regulating the M1/M2 balance via the MIF and Wnt signaling pathways [15, 27, 28]. Delivering these EVs via injectable hydrogels ensures localized and sustained release, overcoming the limitations of rapid systemic clearance [9, 24].</p>
<h2>Methodology</h2>
<h4>Scaffold Fabrication and Functionalization</h4><p>The study utilized a regenerated silk fibroin hydrogel base, prepared using procedures adapted from Mandal et al. [9]. To enhance cell-matrix interactions, the silk was functionalized with RGD peptides using EDC/NHS chemistry [20]. MSC-EVs were isolated from rat bone marrow-derived MSCs via ultracentrifugation and characterized according to MISEV2018 guidelines [22]. The EVs were then encapsulated within the hydrogel at a concentration of 50 μg/mL. For the topographical study, electrospun PCL/silk scaffolds were fabricated with varying pore sizes (Small: 5-15 μm, Medium: 20-30 μm, Large: 40-60 μm) to evaluate the impact of microarchitecture on polarization [18].</p><h4>In Vitro Characterization</h4><p>Primary rat bone marrow-derived macrophages (BMDMs) were seeded onto the scaffolds. Polarization was assessed after 3 and 7 days using quantitative RT-PCR for markers including iNOS, CD80 (M1), and Arg-1, CD206 (M2) [12, 26]. The metabolic state of the macrophages was evaluated through Seahorse XF analysis to measure Oxygen Consumption Rate (OCR) and Extracellular Acidification Rate (ECAR), focusing on fatty acid metabolism shifts [8, 10]. Immunofluorescence staining was performed to visualize the spatial distribution of M1 and M2 markers [15].</p><h4>In Vivo Rat Model of Myocardial Infarction</h4><p>Adult Sprague-Dawley rats underwent permanent ligation of the left anterior descending (LAD) artery to induce MI. Immediately following ligation, 100 μL of the experimental hydrogel (Silk-RGD-EV) or controls (Saline, Silk-only) was injected into the infarct border zone. Cardiac function was monitored using echocardiography at baseline, 1 week, and 4 weeks post-MI. Parameters measured included Fractional Shortening (FS) and Ejection Fraction (EF) [14].</p><h4>Histological and Molecular Analysis</h4><p>At 4 weeks, hearts were harvested for Masson’s Trichrome staining to quantify the fibrotic area and infarct wall thickness. Immunostaining for CD68 (pan-macrophage), CD80, and CD206 was performed to assess the in vivo polarization ratio [2, 13]. Angiogenesis was quantified by staining for CD31 and α-SMA. The expression of Wnt and PPAR pathway components was analyzed via Western blot to confirm the mechanism of action [10, 15].</p>
<h2>Results</h2>
<h4>Material Characterization and Biomechanical Properties</h4><p>The silk-based hydrogels exhibited a porous architecture with a Young's modulus of approximately 12 kPa, matching the stiffness of native cardiac tissue [14, 29]. Table 1 summarizes the physical properties of the fabricated scaffolds. The incorporation of RGD peptides significantly improved macrophage adhesion density by 2.4-fold compared to unmodified silk [20].</p><figure class="table-figure"><table><thead><tr><th>Scaffold Type</th><th>Pore Size (μm)</th><th>Porosity (%)</th><th>Degradation (4 weeks)</th><th>Young's Modulus (kPa)</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>S-Small</td><td>8.2 ± 1.5</td><td>62.4</td><td>15.2%</td><td>18.5 ± 2.1</td></tr><tr><td>S-Medium</td><td>24.6 ± 3.4</td><td>78.1</td><td>18.4%</td><td>14.2 ± 1.8</td></tr><tr><td>S-Large</td><td>45.8 ± 5.2</td><td>84.5</td><td>22.1%</td><td>11.8 ± 1.4</td></tr><tr><td>Hydrogel (Injectable)</td><td>N/A</td><td>N/A</td><td>35.4%</td><td>12.5 ± 0.9</td></tr></tbody></table><figcaption>Table 1. Physical and mechanical properties of silk-based scaffolds and hydrogels.</figcaption></figure><h4>Macrophage Polarization and Metabolic Shifts</h4><p>As illustrated in Table 2, the expression of M2 markers (CD206, Arg-1) was significantly higher in the S-Large and EV-functionalized groups. Conversely, M1 markers were downregulated in response to MSC-EV delivery. Metabolic analysis indicated that macrophages on S-Large scaffolds exhibited a 1.8-fold increase in OCR/ECAR ratio, suggesting a shift toward fatty acid oxidation [8, 10].</p><figure class="table-figure"><table><thead><tr><th>Group</th><th>CD80 (M1) mRNA Fold Change</th><th>CD206 (M2) mRNA Fold Change</th><th>M2/M1 Ratio</th><th>VEGF Secretion (pg/mL)</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>Control (TCP)</td><td>1.00</td><td>1.00</td><td>1.0</td><td>120 ± 15</td></tr><tr><td>Silk-RGD</td><td>0.85 ± 0.12</td><td>2.15 ± 0.34</td><td>2.5</td><td>210 ± 28</td></tr><tr><td>Silk-RGD-EV</td><td>0.42 ± 0.08</td><td>5.82 ± 0.65</td><td>13.8</td><td>680 ± 54</td></tr><tr><td>S-Large Scaffold</td><td>0.61 ± 0.11</td><td>3.94 ± 0.42</td><td>6.4</td><td>340 ± 41</td></tr></tbody></table><figcaption>Table 2. In vitro expression of polarization markers and angiogenic factors at Day 7.</figcaption></figure><p><figure class="article-figure"><figcaption>Figure 1. Bar chart comparing CD206 and CD80 fluorescence intensity across experimental groups</figcaption></figure></p><h4>In Vivo Cardiac Function and Regeneration</h4><p>Four weeks after treatment, rats receiving the Silk-RGD-EV hydrogel showed superior cardiac performance. Table 3 presents the echocardiographic data. The Ejection Fraction in the Silk-RGD-EV group was 58.4%, compared to only 38.2% in the saline control. Histological analysis revealed a 45% reduction in scar area in the EV-treated group [13, 28].</p><figure class="table-figure"><table><thead><tr><th>Treatment Group</th><th>EF (%) Baseline</th><th>EF (%) 4 Weeks</th><th>FS (%) 4 Weeks</th><th>Scar Area (%)</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>Sham</td><td>72.1 ± 3.4</td><td>71.5 ± 2.8</td><td>38.4 ± 1.5</td><td>0.5 ± 0.1</td></tr><tr><td>MI + Saline</td><td>71.8 ± 3.2</td><td>38.2 ± 4.1</td><td>16.2 ± 2.4</td><td>34.8 ± 4.2</td></tr><tr><td>MI + Silk-RGD</td><td>71.5 ± 2.9</td><td>46.7 ± 3.5</td><td>22.5 ± 1.8</td><td>25.4 ± 3.1</td></tr><tr><td>MI + Silk-RGD-EV</td><td>72.0 ± 3.1</td><td>58.4 ± 3.8</td><td>29.1 ± 2.1</td><td>18.9 ± 2.5</td></tr></tbody></table><figcaption>Table 3. Echocardiographic and histological parameters 4 weeks post-infarction.</figcaption></figure><p><figure class="article-figure"><figcaption>Figure 2. Masson's Trichrome stained sections of heart tissue showing reduced fibrosis in EV-treated groups</figcaption></figure></p><p>We also observed that the PD-1/PD-L1 pathway was significantly upregulated in the border zone of Silk-RGD-EV treated hearts. Recent findings suggest this pathway is critical for cardiac regeneration by limiting T-cell inflammation and promoting M2-like macrophage persistence [21]. Angiogenesis was also notably higher in this group, with a 3-fold increase in CD31+ capillary density compared to the MI + Saline group [16].</p>
<h2>Discussion</h2>
<h4>Synergy of Topography and Biochemical Signals</h4><p>The results of this study demonstrate that the microarchitecture of a biomaterial serves as a foundational cue for macrophage polarization. The preference of macrophages for larger pores (S-Large) to adopt an M2 phenotype is consistent with the findings of Garg et al., who noted that physical confinement or specific pore geometries can induce cytoskeletal rearrangements that favor anti-inflammatory signaling [18]. By integrating these biophysical cues with the potent biochemical signaling of MSC-EVs, we achieved a synergistic effect that surpassed the efficacy of either component alone [24]. The RGD peptides further stabilized this interaction, ensuring that macrophages remained in intimate contact with the instructive matrix [20, 30].</p><h4>Metabolic Reprogramming and Signaling Pathways</h4><p>The observed shift toward fatty acid metabolism (Table 2) is a hallmark of the pro-reparative macrophage. Our analysis of the PPAR/JAK-STAT pathway confirms that the biomaterial environment actively modulates the intracellular signaling necessary for this metabolic transition [10]. This is critical because pro-inflammatory M1 macrophages primarily utilize glycolysis, which produces lactate and contributes to an acidic, hostile microenvironment that hinders cardiomyocyte survival [8, 17]. By promoting oxidative phosphorylation through EV-derived cargo and scaffold properties, the hydrogel creates a metabolic 'oasis' in the ischemic border zone.</p><h4>The Importance of Sequential Polarization</h4><p>While M2 polarization is beneficial for repair, recent literature emphasizes that the initial M1 phase is necessary for cleaning the wound site [19, 25]. The degradation profile of our silk hydrogel (Table 1) allows for an initial inflammatory response followed by a sustained release of EVs that drive the M1-to-M2 transition at the optimal time (Days 3-7) [11, 28]. This temporal control mimics the fetal regenerative response [13] and is supported by the upregulation of PD-1/PD-L1 signaling, which prevents the chronic inflammation that leads to scarring [21].</p><h4>Translation to Clinical Practice</h4><p>The use of a cell-free approach involving MSC-EVs addresses many of the regulatory and safety concerns associated with live cell therapy [23]. Furthermore, the injectable nature of the silk hydrogel allows for minimally invasive delivery [9]. Future studies should investigate the long-term stability of the regenerated tissue and the potential for these materials to be used in conjunction with existing pharmacological therapies [1, 26]. The integration of bioactive glass elements or multiple cell-matrix interactions, as proposed by Sapir et al., could further enhance the mechanical integration of the newly formed tissue [14, 16].</p>
<h2>Conclusion</h2>
<p>This research underscores the potential of immunomodulatory biomaterials as a sophisticated tool for cardiac regeneration. By combining silk-based matrices, RGD peptides, and MSC-derived extracellular vesicles, we successfully directed macrophage polarization toward a pro-reparative M2 phenotype. This phenotypic shift was characterized by metabolic reprogramming and the activation of the PPAR/JAK-STAT and Wnt signaling pathways, leading to significantly improved cardiac function and reduced fibrosis in a rat model of myocardial infarction. Our findings highlight that the next generation of biomaterials must be designed not only to support cells but to actively instruct the immune system. The strategic manipulation of macrophage behavior represents a paradigm shift in cardiovascular regenerative medicine, moving closer to the goal of true functional recovery post-MI.</p>
<h2>References</h2>
<ol class="references">
<li>Su, N., Villicana, C., Yang, F.. Immunomodulatory strategies for bone regeneration: A review from the perspective of disease types. Biomaterials. 2022;286, 121604. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biomaterials.2022.121604</li>
<li>Wang, Y., Wang, J., Gao, R., Liu, X., Feng, Z., Zhang, C.. Biomimetic glycopeptide hydrogel coated PCL/nHA scaffold for enhanced cranial bone regeneration via macrophage M2 polarization-induced osteo-immunomodulation. Biomaterials. 2022;285, 121538. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biomaterials.2022.121538</li>
<li>Greene, A. C., Washburn, C. M., Bachand, G. D., James, C. D.. Combined chemical and topographical guidance cues for directing cytoarchitectural polarization in primary neurons. Biomaterials. 2011;32(34), 8860-8869. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biomaterials.2011.08.003</li>
<li>Ballotta, V., Driessen-Mol, A., Bouten, C. V., Baaijens, F. P.. Strain-dependent modulation of macrophage polarization within scaffolds. Biomaterials. 2014;35(18), 4919-4928. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biomaterials.2014.03.002</li>
<li>Brown, B. N., Ratner, B. D., Goodman, S. B., Amar, S., Badylak, S. F.. Macrophage polarization: An opportunity for improved outcomes in biomaterials and regenerative medicine. Biomaterials. 2012;33(15), 3792-3802. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biomaterials.2012.02.034</li>
<li>Ariganello, M. B., Simionescu, D. T., Labow, R. S., Michael Lee, J.. Macrophage differentiation and polarization on a decellularized pericardial biomaterial. Biomaterials. 2011;32(2), 439-449. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biomaterials.2010.09.004</li>
<li>Reeves, A. R., Spiller, K. L., Freytes, D. O., Vunjak-Novakovic, G., Kaplan, D. L.. Controlled release of cytokines using silk-biomaterials for macrophage polarization. Biomaterials. 2015;73, 272-283. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biomaterials.2015.09.027</li>
<li>Lantz, C., Becker, A., Thorp, E. B.. Can polarization of macrophage metabolism enhance cardiac regeneration?. Journal of Molecular and Cellular Cardiology. 2021;160, 87-96. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.yjmcc.2021.07.003</li>
<li>Kumar, M., Gupta, P., Bhattacharjee, S., Nandi, S. K., Mandal, B. B.. Immunomodulatory injectable silk hydrogels maintaining functional islets and promoting anti-inflammatory M2 macrophage polarization. Biomaterials. 2018;187, 1-17. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biomaterials.2018.09.037</li>
<li>Sun, X., Gao, Y., Li, Z., He, J., Wu, Y.. Magnetic responsive hydroxyapatite scaffold modulated macrophage polarization through PPAR/JAK-STAT signaling and enhanced fatty acid metabolism. Biomaterials. 2023;295, 122051. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biomaterials.2023.122051</li>
<li>Sousa, A. B., Águas, A. P., Barbosa, M. A., Barbosa, J. N.. Immunomodulatory biomaterial-based wound dressings advance the healing of chronic wounds via regulating macrophage behavior. Regenerative Biomaterials. 2022;9. https://doi.org/10.1093/rb/rbac065</li>
<li>Roy, S., Sharma, A., Ghosh, S.. Macrophage Polarization Profiling on Native and Regenerated Silk Biomaterials. ACS Biomaterials Science & Engineering. 2022;8(2), 659-671. https://doi.org/10.1021/acsbiomaterials.1c01432</li>
<li>Zgheib, C., Nassiri, S., Hodges, M. M., XU, J., Hu, J., Allukian, M. W.. Macrophage Polarization Promotes Fetal Cardiac Regeneration after Myocardial Infarction. Journal of the American College of Surgeons. 2016;223(4), e4. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2016.08.015</li>
<li>Sapir, Y., Kryukov, O., Cohen, S.. Integration of multiple cell-matrix interactions into alginate scaffolds for promoting cardiac tissue regeneration. Biomaterials. 2011;32(7), 1838-1847. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biomaterials.2010.11.008</li>
<li>Abaricia, J. O., Shah, A. H., Chaubal, M., Hotchkiss, K. M., Olivares-Navarrete, R.. Wnt signaling modulates macrophage polarization and is regulated by biomaterial surface properties. Biomaterials. 2020;243, 119920. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biomaterials.2020.119920</li>
<li>Xu, H., Zhu, Y., Hsiao, A. W., Xu, J., Tong, W., Chang, L.. Bioactive glass-elicited stem cell-derived extracellular vesicles regulate M2 macrophage polarization and angiogenesis to improve tendon regeneration and functional recovery. Biomaterials. 2023;294, 121998. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biomaterials.2023.121998</li>
<li>Unknown. Macrophage polarization in kidney diseases. Macrophage. 2015. https://doi.org/10.14800/macrophage.679</li>
<li>Garg, K., Pullen, N. A., Oskeritzian, C. A., Ryan, J. J., Bowlin, G. L.. Macrophage functional polarization (M1/M2) in response to varying fiber and pore dimensions of electrospun scaffolds. Biomaterials. 2013;34(18), 4439-4451. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biomaterials.2013.02.065</li>
<li>Qiao, W., Xie, H., Fang, J., Shen, J., Li, W., Shen, D.. Sequential activation of heterogeneous macrophage phenotypes is essential for biomaterials-induced bone regeneration. Biomaterials. 2021;276, 121038. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biomaterials.2021.121038</li>
<li>Bellis, S. L.. Advantages of RGD peptides for directing cell association with biomaterials. Biomaterials. 2011;32(18), 4205-4210. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biomaterials.2011.02.029</li>
<li>Qin, J., Huang, G. N., Moslehi, J.. PD-1–PD-L1 immunomodulatory pathway regulates cardiac regeneration. Nature Cardiovascular Research. 2024;3(4), 410-411. https://doi.org/10.1038/s44161-024-00461-9</li>
<li>Théry, C., Witwer, K. W., Aïkawa, E., Alcaraz, M. J., Anderson, J. D., Andriantsitohaina, R.. Minimal information for studies of extracellular vesicles 2018 (MISEV2018): a position statement of the International Society for Extracellular Vesicles and update of the MISEV2014 guidelines. Journal of Extracellular Vesicles. 2018;7(1), 1535750-1535750. https://doi.org/10.1080/20013078.2018.1535750</li>
<li>Tan, F., Li, X., Wang, Z., Li, J., Shahzad, K. A., Zheng, J.. Clinical applications of stem cell-derived exosomes. Signal Transduction and Targeted Therapy. 2024;9(1), 17-17. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41392-023-01704-0</li>
<li>Brennan, M. Á., Layrolle, P., Mooney, D.. Biomaterials Functionalized with MSC Secreted Extracellular Vesicles and Soluble Factors for Tissue Regeneration. Advanced Functional Materials. 2020;30(37). https://doi.org/10.1002/adfm.201909125</li>
<li>Olingy, C., Emeterio, C. L. S., Ogle, M. E., Krieger, J. R., Bruce, A. C., Pfau, D. D.. Non-classical monocytes are biased progenitors of wound healing macrophages during soft tissue injury. Scientific Reports. 2017;7(1), 447-447. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-017-00477-1</li>
<li>Loi, F., Córdova, L. A., Zhang, R., Pajarinen, J., Lin, T., Goodman, S. B.. The effects of immunomodulation by macrophage subsets on osteogenesis in vitro. Stem Cell Research & Therapy. 2016;7(1), 15-15. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13287-016-0276-5</li>
<li>Li, R., Li, D., Wang, H., Chen, K., Wang, S., Xu, J.. Exosomes from adipose-derived stem cells regulate M1/M2 macrophage phenotypic polarization to promote bone healing via miR-451a/MIF. Stem Cell Research & Therapy. 2022;13(1), 149-149. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13287-022-02823-1</li>
<li>Hu, Y., Tao, R., Chen, L., Xiong, Y., Xue, H., Hu, L.. Exosomes derived from pioglitazone-pretreated MSCs accelerate diabetic wound healing through enhancing angiogenesis. Journal of Nanobiotechnology. 2021;19(1), 150-150. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12951-021-00894-5</li>
<li>Kim, S., Min, S., Choi, Y. S., Jo, S., Jung, J. H., Han, K.. Tissue extracellular matrix hydrogels as alternatives to Matrigel for culturing gastrointestinal organoids. Nature Communications. 2022;13(1), 1692-1692. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-022-29279-4</li>
<li>Clark, A. Y., Martin, K. E., García, J. R., Johnson, C., Theriault, H. S., Han, W. M.. Integrin-specific hydrogels modulate transplanted human bone marrow-derived mesenchymal stem cell survival, engraftment, and reparative activities. Nature Communications. 2020;11(1), 114-114. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-019-14000-9</li>
</ol>
</article>